A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours around the construction of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved into a extremely publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development is effective at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, look for to construct their family home. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded people. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining made by their future neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted beneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment over a Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result parts are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has because become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the track record and Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting rather that it is about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got explained their lengthy-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children house in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist information and authorized plans. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential problems which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.